University Futures, Library Futures: Emerging directions in ...

University Futures, Library Futures: Emerging directions in ...

UNIVERSITY FUTURES, LIBRARY FUTURES Emerging directions in shared library services: a discussion with shared library and consortium directors 11 February 2018 | ALA Midwinter Conference Constance Malpas [email protected] Rona Stein [email protected] University Futures, Library Futures OCLC Research and Ithaka S+R collaboration with support from Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Examining impact of increasing differentiation of US higher education on the organization of academic libraries Shift from collection-centric model of excellence to engagement-oriented model supporting distinctive needs of parent institution More information: oc.lc/libfutures University Futures, Library Futures

Institution Typology: working model Population: 1506 US higher education institutions (HEI) comprising four-year public and private non-profit degreegranting colleges and universities Unit of analysis: institution as defined by IPEDS unit ID Institutional profiles derived from 2015 IPEDS survey data: What colleges and universities do (research, liberal education, career preparation) How/for whom they do it (traditional vs. new traditional) University Futures, Library Futures Most four-year institutions exhibit multiple tendencies; they have several lines of business distinctive focus on preparation for career

professions Career University Futures, Library Futures Research distinctive focus on doctoral research and scholarship distinctive focus on interdisciplinary baccalaureate education Liberal Education Modalities of Provision in US Higher Education (N=1506): Traditional v. New Traditional Enrollment Profile and Learning Exprience

100% 90% 44% New Traditional 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 56% Traditional 10%

0% Institutional percent Traditional University Futures, Library Futures Institutional percent New Traditional University Futures, Library Futures Model can be used to examine groups of institutions for conformance to type University Futures, Library Futures University Futures, Library Futures University Futures, Library Futures

CONSORTIUM PROFILES Model can be used to compare Selected Group Averages institutional directions in BTAA SCELC different groups Research Opportunities for shared service provision, value of cross-consortium partnerships? Career

University Futures, Library Futures Liberal Education Selected Group Averages PALNI WRLC Research Are service needs in different consortium types diverging? Career University Futures, Library Futures

Liberal Education EXERCISE 1: UNIVERSITY DIRECTIONS Objectives Identify current, emerging opportunities for shared library services supporting liberal education, career preparation, research in your group or shared library Explore incentives for group-scale provision who are the key stakeholders? Who decides which services should be sourced/deployed at consortium level? 5-10 minutes to jot down reflections (we will collect these at the break) Consolidate and discuss 20 minutes University Futures, Library Futures Research Library services, infrastructure?

Library staff positions? Other library investments or activities? Career University Futures, Library Futures Liberal Education RDM activities RIM/CRIS implementation Text and data analysis services Research Institution-scale library services, staff, stakeholders

Research impact librarian Research data librarian Office of sponsored research VP for Research Training and internship resources First Year Experience Librarian Guided pathways support staff Career Services VP Enrollment Career University Futures, Library Futures E-portfolios

Instructional design services Fablab Student Success Librarian Dean of Undergrad Education Department chairs Liberal Education Shared print collections Shared research data repository Shared staffing: Research impact librarian Scholarly communications librarian Office of sponsored research VP for Research Group licensing of test prep services

Shared staffing: First Year Experience Librarian Career Services VP Enrollment Career University Futures, Library Futures Research Group-scale library services, staff, stakeholders Shared OER repository Shared instructional design services Shared staffing:

Student Success Librarian Dean of Undergrad Education Department chairs Liberal Education EXERCISE 2: NEW TRADITIONAL STUDENTS Nontraditional is the New Traditional Nontraditional learners have at least one of these characteristics: they have no high school diploma, enrolled more than one year after high school, are financially independent from parents, work full time, or are responsible for children or other dependents (Kamenetz, 2015, p. 40) Kamenetz, Anya. 2015. DIY U: Higher Education Goes Hybrid. In Remaking College: The Changing Ecology of Higher

Education, edited by Michael W. Kirst and Mitchell L. Stevens, 3960. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. University Futures, Library Futures Objectives Identify shared library services that support the distinctive needs of Distance learners Part-time enrollees Adult students What constitutes success? E.g. library/consortium role in assisting members achieve institutional enrollment/retention targets; progress toward state/funder mandate for increasing educational provision etc. University Futures, Library Futures Resources: New Traditional Students and Library Services https://www.chronicle.com/article/The-New-Traditional-on/135012

https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2016/08/05/defining-students-nontraditionalinaccurate-and-damaging-essay http://lj.libraryjournal.com/2012/03/opinion/nontraditional-students-are-the-new-ma jority-from-the-bell-tower/#_ http://www.sr.ithaka.org/blog/on-non-traditional-college-students-libraries-and-family -space/ Andria L. Tieman and Megan E. Black (2017) Exploration of Library Outreach to Nontraditional Students Reference & User Services Quarterly, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 198 205 University Futures, Library Futures PARTICIPANT PROFILES SCELC Members in UFLF Population (N=56) Research Caltech R: 0.55, LE:0.34 , C:0.11

Golden Gate University R:0.00 , LE:0.11 , C:0.89 Career University Futures, Library Futures Austin College R: 0.01, LE: 0.99, C:0.00 Liberal Education University Futures, Library Futures BTAA Institutions (N=15) Research University of Chicago

R: 0.49, LE:0.51 , C:0.00 Penn State University R:0.41 , LE:0.37 , C:0.21 Career University Futures, Library Futures University of Chicago R: 0.49, LE:0.51 , C:0.00 Liberal Education University Futures, Library Futures Research

WRLC Institutions (N=8) Georgetown University R: 0.47, LE:0.39 , C:0.14 Marymount University R:0.00 , LE:0.57 , C:0.43 Career University Futures, Library Futures Gallaudet University R: 0.05, LE: 0.73, C:0.22 Liberal Educaiton

University Futures, Library Futures PALNI Members in UFLF Population (N=18) Research Oakland City University R: 0.02, LE:0.58 , C:0.40 University of Saint Francis R:0.00 , LE:0.55 , C:0.45 Career University Futures, Library Futures DePauw University R: 0.00, LE: 1.00, C:0.00

Liberal Education University Futures, Library Futures Minnesota Institutions (N=30) Research University of Minnesota, Twin Cities R: 0.46, LE:0.37 , C:0.18 Concordia University Saint Paul R:0.00 , LE:0.27 , C:0.73 Career University Futures, Library Futures

St. Olaf College R: 0.01, LE: 0.99, C:0.00 Liberal Education University Futures, Library Futures North Dakota Institutions (N=8) Research North Dakota State University R: 0.36, LE:0.40 , C:0.24 Minot State University R:0.01 , LE:0.45 , C:0.55 Career

University Futures, Library Futures University of Jamestown R: 0.00, LE: 0.67, C:0.33 Liberal Education University Futures, Library Futures South DakotaResearch Institutions (N=9) South Dakota State University R: 0.34, LE:0.41 , C:0.35 Mount Marty College R:0.00 , LE:0.37 , C:0.63

Career University Futures, Library Futures Augustana College R: 0.02, LE: 0.72, C:0.26 Liberal Education University Futures, Library Futures Pennsylvania Institutions (N=109) Research Carnegie Mellon University R: 0.50, LE:0.31 , C:0.19

Gwynedd Mercy University R:0.00 , LE:0.35 , C:0.65 Career University Futures, Library Futures Lycoming College R: 0.00, LE: 1.00, C:0.00 Liberal Education University Futures, Library Futures PALCI Institutions in UFLF Population (N=62) Research Carnegie Mellon University

R: 0.50, LE:0.31 , C:0.19 Philadelphia University R:0.00 , LE:0.38 , C:0.62 Career University Futures, Library Futures Lycoming College R: 0.00, LE: 1.00, C:0.00 Liberal Education PALCI Members in UFLF Population (N=62) Institutional Percent Traditional Enrollment Profile and Learning Experience Institutional Percent New Traditional Enrollment Profile and Learning Experience

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% l y ge ity ege eg e ege ege sity ege sity nia sity ege sity nia pus sity sity sity nia ick rsit lege hoo rsity ania rsity rsity ania ania logy rsity

l l e ers l l l r l r r r l r r r a a a

w l l l l l l l l s v m e e e e e

e lv ive Co lv o Sc ive sylv ive ive sylv sylv hno ive ive syl Co niv Co niv Co niv Co Co s Co un niv e C sy Ca niv niv niv nsy n n w

r n n a n n d g h n U U U kU e Un enn l Un k Un enn Un U

U U U en B n U ch r u i at n n i nn Tec o n a w i l i

s n N o e e a e h d l a e a a l n

i s w i i w g e s to n n rf m in es gin of P a-M woo Yor nno of P -Ne owa Ro The ord of P sha Par of P of P and rlo

f P esn Ju han yco ehi ck ckn eth ave Ur o a i r a M t u r i a y i

y L L y y y y y R a ic b e D Bu L C q

n ty H G an ar New ue M Poi sit Du sit rsit enc sit rsit er rsit t V rsi v iza q r r

r s l s l i M s e e E M nive ive ive niv ive nive Sci ive nnsy Su

W n n n n U U U U U s U of r U f Pe o n g d

a y r l i r r e t o i e t i e n u

bo es ity o ar ifor vers sfi utg sb n l h i n C l s R m i a

r Ed tC M Ca Un oo es nive Bl g W U ur b a s i an

rr di a n H I University Futures, Library Futures Loyola Notre Dame Library Loyola University Maryland Notre Dame of Maryland University Research 0.01

0.36 0.63 Career University Futures, Library Futures Liberal Education University Futures, Library Futures Auraria Institutions in UFLF Population University of Colorado Denver Metropolitan State University of Denver Research

0.40 0.14 0.47 Career University Futures, Library Futures Liberal Education University Futures, Library Futures University Futures, Library Futures University Futures, Library Futures

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • Heading - CCC Live Cases

    Heading - CCC Live Cases

    CTO of femoropopliteal arteries. PCTOs are encountered in 40%-50% of patients presenting intermittent claudication or CLI. These patients often have coexistent cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease which increases the 5-year mortality rate by:
  • HWI Strategic Plan - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

    HWI Strategic Plan - National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services A National Obesity-Prevention Program Developed by the National Institutes of Health National Institutes
  • Praying for Ourselves - Bible Studies By Steve

    Praying for Ourselves - Bible Studies By Steve

    Matthew 6:11 (NIV) Give us today our daily bread. Isaiah 38:1-3 In those days Hezekiah became ill and was at the point of death. The prophet Isaiah son of Amoz went to him and said, "This is what the LORD...
  • Seeking out the Voices of Women: Place-based Pedagogical

    Seeking out the Voices of Women: Place-based Pedagogical

    WERC Collection OISE/UT Library. Fine-Meyer Oct 2015. New publications add Canadian women's stories:She Named it Canada: Because that's what it was called(The Corrective Collective 1971) Fine-Meyer Oct 2015.
  • Six Basic Principles of the Constitution

    Six Basic Principles of the Constitution

    Individual Rights Individual rights and liberties are protected against government encroachment The first 10 amendments to the constitution are a list of individual rights Also the 14th amendment says that everyone deserves equal protection under the law 6 Principles of...
  • How the Internet Changed Social Science Research

    How the Internet Changed Social Science Research

    How the Internet Changed Social Science Research Richard J. Butler Economics Gratitude for help: Sebastian Nilsson, Neil Larson, Daniel Butler, Matt Butler, Sam Butler, Department of Economics' Faculty especially Lars Lefgren, Andi Sneed, Katie Johnson, the FHSS College and the...
  • Radios Used in a Contest Environment

    Radios Used in a Contest Environment

    Apache ANAN new software features. Open Source code = new features fast . Better DSP filter defaults, particularly CW ... Connect the antenna and see how many dB the noise goes up when tuned to a dead spot on the...
  • SIM307: Securing Your Windows Platform

    SIM307: Securing Your Windows Platform

    Browser limited to intranet browsing only. Only server administrators can login to workstation. 2 factor authentication ideal. ... Demonstrate how to create a secure and usable administrative desktop using SCM, EMET, Applocker, and ASA.