HVM Crash Testing Standards Explained - HVMhub

HVM Crash Testing Standards Explained - HVMhub

HVM Crash Testing Standards Explained Regulations Evaluating Impact Performance Publicly Available Standard (PAS 68 Latest version 2013 UK based threat vehicles Likely withdrawn 2018 ASTM F2656 Latest Version 2015 North America threat Vehicles Superseded DOS or SD/STD2.01 IWA14-1 Latest version 2013 Includes all-world threat vehicles contained in PAS 68 & ASTM F2656 Due for review 2017 Regulations Evaluating Impact Performance Publicly Available Standard (PAS 68 Latest version 2013

UK based threat vehicles Likely withdrawn 2018 CEN CWA 16221:2010 European Workshop agreement Combines elements of PAS 68 & PAS 69 ASTM F2656 Latest Version 2015 North America Three Vehicles Superseded DOS or SD/STD2.01 IWA14-1 Latest version 2013 Includes all-world threat vehicles contained in PAS68 & ASTM F2656 Due for review 2017 Current HVM Standards ASTM F2656-15 US standard issued by ASTM (American Society for Testing & Materials) Updated in 2015 Replaces SD/STD2.01 Rev A, US Department of State Standard

K Ratings no longer exist replaced by vehicle categories C, P, M, H PAS 68:2013 UK standard prepared in conjunction with CPNI / BSI Recently undergone 2nd update Updated in 2015 IWA14-1:2013 World Standard prepared in conjunction with CPNI /BSI with input from US Department of State Combines aspects of ASTM & PAS 68 All these tests can be conducted at a variety of impact speeds PAS 68:2013 6 Vehicle Categories Impact Speed 16-112km/h Penetration measured from REAR edge of product structure Product given performance rating made up from:1 2 3 4 5 6 Vehicle Impact

Vehicle Mass (class) Impact Speed Impact Angle Penetration Debris Dispersal Example performance classification: PAS 68:2013 Bollard V/7500(N2)/80/90:0.0/3.6 ASTM F2656-2015 Superseded DOS standard and K ratings 6 Vehicle Categories Impact Speed 48-100km/h Penetration measured from REAR edge of product structure and given a P rating 1,2 or 3 Product given performance rating made up from:1 2

3 Vehicle Category Impact Speed (mile/h) Penetration Rating Example performance classification: A classification of Test Method F2656 M50-P1 is equivalent to DOS K12 Test method F2656 C7:50-P3 IWA14-1 2013 9 Vehicle Categories Impact Speed 16-112km/h Debris measurement is omitted in performance classification, although recorded in full report. Penetration measured from FRONT edge of product structure Product given performance rating made up from:1 2 3

4 5 Vehicle Impact Vehicle Mass (class) Impact Speed Impact Angle Penetration Example performance classification: IWA14-1:2013 Bollard V/7500[N2A]/80/90:0 Comparing Product performance codes: PAS 68:2013 1 2 3 4

5 6 Vehicle Impact Vehicle Mass (class) Impact Speed Impact Angle Penetration Debris Dispersal Example performance classification: PAS 68:2013 Bollard V/7500(N2)/80/90:0.0/3.6 ASTM F2656 1 2 3 Vehicle Category Impact Speed (mile/h)

Penetration Rating Example performance classification: Test method F2656 C7:50-P3 IWA14-1 2013 1 2 3 4 5 Vehicle Impact Vehicle Mass (class) Impact Speed Impact Angle Penetration Example performance classification: IWA14-1:2013 Bollard V/7500[N2A]/80/90:0:2 ASTM F2656-15 Vehicles

SC 1100kg FS 2100kg PU 2300kg M 6800kg C7 7200kg H 29500kg PAS 68: 2013 Vehicles M1 1100kg N1G

2500kg N1 3500kg N2 7500kg N3 7200kg N3 29500kg Inter-relation of the Standards Car/LGV IWA14-1:2013 PAS 68:2013 1500 M1 ASTM F2656-15 1500 M1 1100 SC

2100 FS 2500 N1G 2500 N1G 3500 N1 3500 N1 7500 N2 7200 N2A 2300 PU Inter-relation of the Standards Car/LGV IWA14-1:2013 PAS 68:2013 7500 N3

ASTM F2656-15 7200 N2B 6800 M 7200 N3C 7200 C7 12000 N3D 24000 N3E 30000 N3 30000 N3F 29500 H Most Commonly Compared Vehicle PAS 68 ASTM F2656

ASTM F2656 DOS SC/STD2.01 IWA 14-1 Vehicle Category N2 Standard Test Truck (M) Clas-7 Cab-Over (C7) Standard Truck N2A Impact Mass (kg) 7500 6800 7200 6800 7200

Impact Speed (km/h) 48 50 (30mile/h) 50 (30mile/h) K4-50 (30mile/h) 48 Impact Energy (kj) 667 656 694 656 640 Impact Speed (km/h) 64 65 (40mile/h) 65 (40mile/h)

K8-65 (40mile/h) 64 Impact Energy (kj) 1185 1108 1174 1108 1138 Impact Speed (km/h) High Test Speed Not permitted 80 (50 mile/h) 80 (50 mile/h) K12-80 (50 mile/h) 80 1679 1778

1679 1778 Impact Energy (kj) Understanding the performance criteria VSB datum line Key 1 = Direction of impact 2 = VSB datum line (the point from where penetration of the vehicle is measured) 3 = Bollard 4 = Gate / rising/swing arm barrier 5 = Planter 6 = Road Blocker 7 = Ditch 8 = Bund/ Berm 9 = Wall PAS 68 IWA 14-1 & ASTM F2656 Understanding the performance criteria The Vehicle Datum Point

Key 1 = Vehicle Datum Point M1 & N1G vehicles; reference line passing through the centre of the A-pillars at the lowest point of the windscreen. N1,N2 or N3 day cab vehicles: reference line intersecting the load bed and the headboard Understanding the performance criteria How penetration is measured IWA 14-1 PAS 68 0 Key 1 = Vehicle Security Barrier / test item 2 = VSB datum line 3 = Vehicle datum point 4 = Vehicle penetration distance 5 = Major debris 6 = Major debris distance 7 = Indication of change in position of penetration measurement FAQ / Misconceptions regarding vehicles / tests My client wants an ASTM K12 test K ratings have never existed in ASTM. K ratings were superseded in 2007 by the introduction of ASTM 2656. The Department of State K12 should correctly be referred to as an ASTM M50. What is the equivalent of an ASTM M50 test in PAS68/IWA14-1? The closest equivalent test is V/7500(N3)/80/90 or IWA14-1:2013 V/7200[N3]/

80/90. This is N3 (18T rated vehicle massed to 7500kg or 7200kg) at 80km/h and 90deg. What is the difference between an IWA14-1, ASTM and PAS68 tests? In addition to the vehicle dimensions and impact energy variances, there is a difference in test conditions. Under ASTM the product must be installed into a low cohesive compacted soil. PAS68 does not define and installation configuration. IWA14 describes both in soil or site specific/rigid installation. Does the introduction of IWA14-1 obsolete or negate previous testing standards? No, IWA 14-1 does not negate or obsolete testing carried out to the PAS 68 or CWA 16221 criteria. IWA 14-1 is a progression of these testing standards and combines elements of the ASTM standard & PAS 68 to produce a cohesive standard.

Recently Viewed Presentations

  • CE 394K.2 Hydrology, Lecture 1 Introduction to Hydrology

    CE 394K.2 Hydrology, Lecture 1 Introduction to Hydrology

    Arial Calibri Default Design CE 374K Hydrology - Lecture 1 Hydrology as a Science Hydrology as a Profession Hydrologic Cycle Global water balance (volumetric) Digital Atlas of the World Water Balance (Precipitation) Global water balance Global Water Resources PowerPoint Presentation...
  • Tutorial: Cross-section stability of a W-section

    Tutorial: Cross-section stability of a W-section

    Learning objectives Identify all the buckling modes in a W-section For columns explore flexural (Euler) buckling and local buckling For beams explore lateral-torsional buckling and local buckling Predict the buckling stress (load or moment) for identified buckling modes Learn the...
  • Expansion of European Power and the New Imperialism

    Expansion of European Power and the New Imperialism

    New Imperialism. During the last third of the nineteenth century, European nations rapidly extended their control over the rest of the globe. The New Imperialism. Imperialism. Establishing authority over another nation by exercising economic and political force or by territorial...
  • Nonvascular Plants - Biology Junction

    Nonvascular Plants - Biology Junction

    Nonvascular & Simple Vascular Plants Mosses to Ferns * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *...
  • DAVID GEIGER BAE  STRUCTURAL OPTION DULLES TOWN CENTER

    DAVID GEIGER BAE STRUCTURAL OPTION DULLES TOWN CENTER

    granby tower norfolk, virginia senior thesis presentation 14 april 2008 DAVID GEIGER BAE - STRUCTURAL OPTION DULLES TOWN CENTER BUILDING ONE DULLES, VIRGINIA SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION 14 APRIL 2009
  • Happy people  Good investments A case of Shared

    Happy people Good investments A case of Shared

    Presentation. My focus today will be on the Shared Care platform, which we have developed in collaboration with IBM because we believe that this platform is a very good investment that leads to happy people.
  • Jonesboro Middle School Mr. Corey Stephens, Principal

    Jonesboro Middle School Mr. Corey Stephens, Principal

    the georgia milestones assessment system (georgia milestones) is a comprehensive summative assessment pro gram spanning grades 3 through high school. georgia milestones measures how well students have learned the knowledge and skills outlined in the state-adopted content standards in english...
  • Sensory memory - Aloha & Welcome Aboard

    Sensory memory - Aloha & Welcome Aboard

    Semantic memory: record of facts, concepts and skills that we have acquired. is derived from episodic memory: we can learn new facts or concepts from our experiences. ... syntactic slanting c) anticipatory name calling d) telegraphic speech MEMORY WHAT'S IN...